Marx and Moore - 744 Words

The biggest difference between the views of Marx and Davis and Moore resides in the issue of the distribution of resources. While Marx believes that there is an inequality in the distribution of resources between the bourgeoisie and proletariat classes, Davis and Moore theorize that inequality has to happen so that the most important positions are filled by the most qualified. Marx perceives society made up as two classes, the powerful and exploitive higher class known as the bourgeoisie and the industrial wage earners that must earn their living by selling their labor known as the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is known as the private property owners and the proletariat works for the bourgeoisie. There is an inequality between these two†¦show more content†¦Therefore, it can be simplified down to this: the proletariat is always working not for himself but for the bourgeoisie in order to survive, producing products that will not only be taken away from them but decrease their human value as well. If one is to assign a monetary value to a proletariat’s life, for example a hundred dollars, each time the proletariat works, a dollar will be decreased from his total value and in the end he is basically left with nothing. However, since the bourgeoisie is the capitalist, he gains from the products produced by the proletariat and increases his own wealth as well. This inequality is why Marx believes there should be a classless society because the bourgeoisie will continue to exploit the hard working proletariats until they void themselves of any human value. It is unfair to have a minority ruling wealthy class over a majority class of working laborers. However, Davis and Moore disagree with how it is unfair to have a wealthy class ruling over the working class. Davis and Moore believe a society will function properly only if it instills certain individuals to certain positions, such that the more important positions are fulfilled by those that are most c apable. Stratification is thus filling different levels of prestige with individuals that are qualified. Since higher positions require more talent and/or training, the individuals that fill those positions areShow MoreRelatedCapitalism Is A Way Of Organizing An Economy875 Words   |  4 PagesIn the Michael Moore documentary Capitalism a Love Story examples what capitalism is and how it hurt so many citizens. Capitalism is a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government. The documentary teaches viewers the impact that big corporations have on americans. At the beginning of the film Moore is showing middle class people get there houses taken from them because ofRead MoreContemporary Theory: Stratification Essay examples1245 Words   |  5 Pagesservices unequally† (Grusky, Ku, and Szelenyi 2008; Tumin 1953). Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore (1945) est ablish a main function of stratification; which can be explained by the â€Å"requirement faced by any society of placing and motivating individuals in social structure[s]† (242). Through this, the basis of stratification arises from the fundamental works of the forefathers of sociology, Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim each establishes a foundation as â€Å"almost all contemporary stratificationRead MoreCompare and Contrast Marxist and Weberian Theories of Stratification1525 Words   |  7 Pagesand perspectives of both Karl Marx and Max Weber. O’Donnell (1992) defines social stratification as â€Å"the division of a society or group into hierarchically ordered layers. Members of each layer are considered broadly equal but there is inequality between the layers.† Functionalist Durkheim (1858-1917) argued that the reason for the existence of stratification was because it was functional or beneficial to the order of society. According to Browne et al (2009), Karl Marx (1818-83) theorised that classRead MoreSocial Stratification Of A Modern Day Society1224 Words   |  5 Pagessocial stratification is described in various manners by classical theorists Marx, Durkheim, and Weber. While there are certain drawbacks of social inequality theories, the pioneer sociologists have adequately tried to describe the reasons and solutions for social stratification of society. The theorists have changed the knowledge on dynamics of economy and society by giving their different perspective on the topic. Marx considered the economy as the basis for determination of all social structuresRead MoreCompare the Functionalist and Marxist Views on Social Stratification1740 Words   |  7 Pageswas accepted as a part of society since he felt that those in authority used their power to pursue collective goals which derive from society’s central values. The most famous Functionalist theory of stratification has been put forward by (Davis Moore ,1998 in Haralambos Holborn, 2004). They felt that stratification existed in every known human society; they argued that all social systems share certain functional prerequisites which must be met if the system is to survive and operate efficientlyRead MoreCompare the Functionalist and Marxist Views on Social Stratification1734 Words   |  7 Pageswas accepted as a part of society since he felt that those in authority used their power to pursue collective goals which derive from society’s central values. The most famous Functionalist theory of stratification has been put forward by (Davis Moore ,1998 in Haralambos Holborn, 2004). They felt that stratification existed in every known human society; they argued that all social systems share certain functional prerequisites which must be met if the system is to survive and operate efficientlyRead MoreSome Principles Of Stratification By Kingsley Davis And Wilbert E. Moore1672 Words   |  7 PagesIn this paper I will discuss â€Å"Some Principles of Stratification† by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore. Their work focuses on stratification, social class, positional rank, and their effects on individuals and society. The second work â€Å"Classes in Capitalism and Pre-Capitalism† by Karl Marx, highlights inequality in society regarding the relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and methods of production and their effects on society. Finally, inRead MorePrinciples Of S tratification On Society1547 Words   |  7 PagesThis paper will be discussing â€Å"Some Principles of Stratification† by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore, â€Å"Classes in Capitalism and Pre- Capitalism† by Karl Marx, and â€Å"Who Rules America?† by G. William Domhoff. Davis and Moore examine stratification, social class, and positional rank and their effects on individuals and society. Marx examines inequality in society, the relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and methods of production and theirRead MoreStructural Functionalist And Marx And Engels s Theory Of Stratification1238 Words   |  5 Pagesmeaning rock layers. Throughout this paper I will touch base on ways structural functionalist and Marx and Engels view stratification in society, different way exploitation take place in capitalist society according to Marx and Engles, the basic elements of exploitation, the forces that keep society f rom rebelling, and a few ways Davis and Moore critique Marx and Engels’ model of stratification. Both Marx and Engels agree that stratification is unnecessary within society. They both believe that stratificationRead MoreThe Utopia Of Communism : Why No Communist Country Has Been Successful1613 Words   |  7 PagesThe Utopia of Communism: Why no Communist Country has been Successful After it was conceived from the mind of Karl Marx, a Communist form of government has appealed to many societies, especially before and during World War II. Some of the strongest countries were built on the principles of Communism, such as the USSR. It came to become an enemy of American values, and challenged the political and civil ideas of that time. However, it quickly dropped out of popularity, and has come to only being